THCA in Trouble: Why Hemp Retailers and States Are Pushing Back

The federal government’s move to redefine hemp with a total-THC standard has put THCA products at risk, sparking fierce resistance from retailers, states, and industry groups. As the battle over regulation versus prohibition intensifies, the future of the hemp industry hangs in the balance.

Updated on
why hemp retailers and several states are challenging or pushing back against new regulations

THCA in Trouble: Why Hemp Retailers and States Are Pushing Back

The debate over THCA is one of the fiercest battles that has arisen in the hemp world. A legal grey area has transformed into a national flashpoint after the federal government decided to close the loopholes that allowed THCA products to flourish.  Retailers, state regulators, and industry groups are rushing to protect their business and consumers – and, in many cases, their entire state-level hemp economy. The pressure is rising from every direction, and the pushback is growing louder by the day.


This is more than just a policy shift — it’s a struggle over how cannabis and hemp should coexist in the U.S., who gets to define the rules, and where small businesses fit in a rapidly changing landscape.

What THCA Is — and Why It’s Suddenly at Risk?

THCA, or tetrahydrocannabinolic acid, is a compound that occurs naturally in raw cannabis. By itself, THCA does not cause intoxication. When heat is applied through smoking, vaping, or baking, Delta-8 THC changes to Delta-9 THC, which is the “high” producing molecule in cannabis.


THCA products have operated in a unique legal grey area for years. Hemp is defined as cannabis containing no more than 0.3% Delta-9 THC on a dry-weight basis. Because the law did not restrict THCA itself, many hemp businesses legally produced and sold THCA-rich flower as long as the Delta-9 content remained within the legal limit. This loophole opened up a huge marketplace for THCA products that included smokable hemp flower, which performed almost exactly like cannabis flower when heated.


However, federal policymakers have claimed that this gap undermines regulatory uniformity, confuses consumers, and makes it difficult to discern legal hemp from regulated cannabis. So now, the fed is moving to redefine hemp using “total THC,” – and that testing method counts both Delta-9 THC and THCA toward the legal limit. With this new definition, most THCA flower will no longer fit the definition of hemp, and thousands of products will be at risk across the country. For more details on early federal warnings, see Rand Paul Fights to Save Hemp from Devastating Ban.

Federal Pressure Builds — and the Industry Pushes Back

The federal move toward a total-THC standard has triggered intense resistance. Hemp retailers argue that THCA products are being sold by them as the original law allowed for THCA, so punishing them is unfair and economically harmful. Many small operators rely heavily on THCA flower in their sales, and the possibility of a nationwide ban terrifies them because it would eliminate their most profitable products overnight. 


Industry groups frame the conflict as a fight for survival. They think regulation is the answer, not prohibition. They believe that THCA products should stay legal, but have consistent age limits, testing rules, labeling requirements, and marketing restrictions. In their view, responsible oversight protects consumers while allowing legitimate businesses to continue operating.


Federal agencies appear to be moving in the opposite direction. A new policy means THCA will be treated like Delta-9 THC when the Federal Enforcement starts. The change extends far beyond lab tests, as many hemp products will be classified as controlled substances, even if they are compliant.


The result is a high-stakes standoff between Washington and the hemp industry.

States Aren’t Staying Quiet — Resistance Is Spreading

Many states and retailers are refusing to wait for enforcement day while federal pressure grows. They’re attempting to push back early or change their laws and do it openly. 


Some states are choosing defiance. According to them, the federal government is overextending its authority by proposing a revamp of hemp policy that has already been formed at the state level. The states believe that as long as some testing, labeling, and age restrictions at the retail level are met, hemp-derived cannabinoids, including THCA, should remain legal.


Other states are taking the opposite approach. They are proactively banning them or adopting total-THC testing ahead of the federal shift. To get ahead of federal enforcement, minimize conflict, and reduce confusion between local law and federal expectations are the goals.


The result is a patchwork of regulations across the country:


  • Several states aim to protect small hemp businesses and save jobs.


  • Others want to separate the hemp and cannabis markets more clearly.


  • A few are choosing to shut down high-THC hemp altogether.


The disparity in growth rates is causing tension not just between states and Washington but also between legal cannabis operators and hemp retailers in the same markets. For insights on the global context and regulatory trends, see Global Cannabis Policy Shifts.

Retailers Launch Their Own Resistance Campaigns

Various shop owners are currently against the shift in the federal stance on cannabis products, along with those retailer owners who deal primarily in THCA flowers. Many of them earn a substantial amount through THCA sales, according to the report. Losing these products could mean shutting down permanently.


Retailers argue that:


  • They have operated within the law as written.


  • They have kept the age verification and product testing processes.


  • Consumers depend on their stores for cheap copies of cannabis products, which are regulated.


Some businesses are banding together to file lawsuits, challenge state-level bans, and pressure legislators to support regulatory solutions rather than enforcement crackdowns. They suggest that THCA should be managed through controlled means rather than being completely wiped out.

Alternative Laws and Preemptive State Bans

As people resist this legislation, many states are adopting positive legislation that redefines the THCA market on their own terms. These laws typically fall into one of three categories.

  1. Total-THC Testing Requirements

States using this model treat THCA the same as Delta-9 THC. If the overall amount is more than 0.3%, it is not legal hemp. This method is successfully removing THCA flower from stores.

  1. Complete Prohibition of Intoxicating Hemp Products

Some states have decided that distinguishing hemp-based THC from marijuana-based THC is too complicated.  Many states have introduced or put into effect total bans on intoxicating hemp cannabinoids like Delta-8 and THCA.

  1. Regulate — Don’t Ban

A small number of states are taking a balanced approach. They allow THCA products but enforce:


  • 21+ age limits.


  • Mandatory potency testing.


  • Packaging regulations.


  • Licensing requirements.


  • Restrictions on marketing to minors.


The states think hemp and legal cannabis can co-exist with proper regulation of both markets.


Conclusion: Where This Fight Is Heading

The conflict over THCA is far from over. The next year will be critical as federal enforcement intensifies and state-level opposition builds. The hemp industry will push for more clarity, not an outright ban. States will continue to shape their own policies. Consumers will closely monitor the impact of this regulatory change on products.


THCA has become much more than just a chemical compound. This has become a symbol of the struggle between prohibition and regulation, the survival of business, and the state. And for now, the resistance is only getting stronger. 


Don’t miss critical hemp updates — subscribe to the CBHD News newsletter today!

Updated on

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.