Statewide Public Opinion Survey — April 2026
The Data Is In.
North Carolina Has Spoken.
An independent survey of 800 registered North Carolina voters reveals overwhelming, bipartisan support for Senate Bill 265 — and a clear political warning for every Republican lawmaker heading into November.
Strategic Partners Solutions · 800 Registered NC Voters · ±3.46% MOE · 95% Confidence
62.6%
Overall Voter
Support for SB 265
Senate Bill 265 — Broad Bipartisan Support
Nearly two-thirds of all North Carolina voters support regulating and protecting the hemp industry.
Support for SB 265 crosses every party line. When voters learn hemp means regulated businesses, licensed dispensaries, and law enforcement oversight — they say yes.
72.4%
Moderate Unaffiliated
Voter Support
The Swing Voter Signal
The voters Republicans need most are hemp’s strongest supporters — by a wide margin.
Moderate unaffiliated voters are the only persuadable bloc Republicans can reach to close the electoral gap. They currently lean Democratic by over 30 points. SB 265 is one of the only available bridges.
66.8%
Support With
Economic Framing
Messaging Impact
When voters hear that SB 265 protects jobs and blocks federal overreach, support climbs higher.
The economic and regulatory protection frame is the strongest message available. Even when federal risk is introduced, support holds steady — proving the issue has real durability under pressure.
30pts
Republican Deficit
With Swing Voters
The Political Warning
Republicans face a historic electoral gap. SB 265 is one of the only lifelines on the table.
Democrats hold a 14-point generic ballot advantage statewide. Moderate unaffiliated voters lean Democratic by over 30 points. Voters prioritize economic issues 2-to-1 — among Republicans, nearly 4-to-1. Failing to act on SB 265 is not a neutral position.
16,000+
NC Jobs Supported
by the Hemp Industry
$87.8M
Annual State Tax
Revenue Generated
800
Registered NC Voters
Surveyed Statewide
±3.46%
Margin of Error
95% Confidence Level
The opinion survey of 800 registered voters living in North Carolina was conducted by telephone by professional interviewers from April 27–28, 2026. The survey included 30% landline interviews and 70% cell phone interviews. All interviews were conducted by live-phone interviewers; no automated or online interviews were conducted. Interview selection was random within predetermined election units via a computer-generated random selection process. These units were structured to correlate with actual voter participation from past midterm/Presidential General Election cycles. The survey has an accuracy of ±3.46% at a 95% confidence interval.
CBHD.NEWS